Triple
T8149210
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | York County, Ontario |
E190290
|
entity |
| Predicate | restructuredInto |
P1504
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional municipalities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: regional municipalities | Statement: [York County, Ontario, restructuredInto, regional municipalities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: restructuredInto Context triple: [York County, Ontario, restructuredInto, regional municipalities]
-
A.
reorganizedAs
chosen
Indicates that an existing entity has been restructured or reconfigured into a new organizational form or arrangement.
-
B.
reorganizedIn
Indicates that an entity underwent a structural or organizational change within a specified context, time, or framework.
-
C.
redistributedInto
Indicates that something previously allocated or distributed is reassigned or spread out again into different parts, groups, or categories.
-
D.
reorganizedDueTo
Indicates that one entity was reorganized as a consequence of, or in response to, another specified factor, event, or condition.
-
E.
reintegratedInto
Indicates that an entity has been brought back and incorporated again into a group, system, or context it was previously separated from.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82be7ba8819087de0147e9292c83 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb447fc4308190b9436b0fe51a70a5 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb36a0847c8190af9038aef78319b3 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:37 p.m.