Triple
T8148123
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Beaver County, Utah |
E190264
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | county in Utah |
C19401
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: county in Utah Context triple: [Beaver County, Utah, instanceOf, county in Utah]
-
A.
county of Utah
chosen
A county of Utah is an administrative subdivision of the state of Utah that functions as a local government unit responsible for regional services, governance, and regulation within its defined geographic boundaries.
-
B.
county in Idaho
A county in Idaho is an administrative subdivision of the state of Idaho that has its own local government and defined geographic boundaries, responsible for providing regional services such as law enforcement, courts, and infrastructure management.
-
C.
county of Colorado
A county of Colorado is an administrative subdivision of the state that serves as a local level of government, providing regional services, governance, and jurisdictional organization for its communities and unincorporated areas.
-
D.
county in the United States
A county in the United States is a local administrative and political subdivision of a state (or equivalent), typically responsible for providing regional services such as law enforcement, courts, record-keeping, and infrastructure management for the communities within its boundaries.
-
E.
county of New Mexico
A county of New Mexico is a primary local government and administrative subdivision of the state, responsible for regional services, governance, and jurisdiction within its defined geographic boundaries.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82be7ba8819087de0147e9292c83 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:36 p.m.