Triple
T8110685
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Quebec Pension Plan |
E189339
|
entity |
| Predicate | benefitPortability |
P81339
|
FINISHED |
| Object | coordinated with other Canadian pension plans |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: coordinated with other Canadian pension plans | Statement: [Quebec Pension Plan, benefitPortability, coordinated with other Canadian pension plans]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: benefitPortability Context triple: [Quebec Pension Plan, benefitPortability, coordinated with other Canadian pension plans]
-
A.
benefitProtection
Indicates that one entity provides protective advantages or safeguards that benefit another entity.
-
B.
benefitAvailableAt
Indicates that a particular benefit can be obtained, accessed, or used at a specified location, time, or context.
-
C.
benefitsAre
Indicates that certain advantages, gains, or positive outcomes are possessed by or accrue to a particular entity or group.
-
D.
benefits
Indicates that one entity gains an advantage, improvement, or positive outcome as a result of another entity or action.
-
E.
benefitAdministered
Indicates that a benefit (such as aid, service, or entitlement) has been formally provided or delivered to an eligible recipient by an administering party.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b9d5848190a24672775d5c5011 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb4664fef881908b0dc7b158aca398 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb368e7f4c81909aabd7716f0de79d |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb46635424819085d086972b264280 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:58 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:32 p.m.