Triple
T8109285
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prahova County |
E189305
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRiver |
P165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Prahova River |
E715597
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Prahova River | Statement: [Prahova County, hasRiver, Prahova River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Prahova River Context triple: [Prahova County, hasRiver, Prahova River]
-
A.
Prahova River
chosen
The Prahova River is a significant river in southern Romania that flows through the Carpathian Mountains and the Prahova Valley before joining the Ialomița River.
-
B.
Argeș River
The Argeș River is a major river in southern Romania that flows through the Carpathian foothills toward the Danube, passing important cities such as Pitești along its course.
-
C.
Bârlad River
The Bârlad River is a significant river in eastern Romania that flows through the historical region of Moldavia before joining the Prut River.
-
D.
Arieș River
The Arieș River is a significant river in western Romania that flows through the Apuseni Mountains and the historical region of Transylvania.
-
E.
Dâmbovița River
The Dâmbovița River is a central Romanian waterway that flows through and historically shaped the development of Bucharest.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b9d5848190a24672775d5c5011 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb42fbc57c81908c6be87bbc547085 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:43 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cced062f3881908560b657c096c92e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:01 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:32 p.m.