Triple
T8109243
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prahova County |
E189305
|
entity |
| Predicate | borders |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dâmbovița County |
E255555
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dâmbovița County | Statement: [Prahova County, borders, Dâmbovița County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dâmbovița County Context triple: [Prahova County, borders, Dâmbovița County]
-
A.
Timiș County
Timiș County is an administrative region in western Romania, known for its capital city Timișoara and its role as an economic and cultural hub in the Banat region.
-
B.
Argeș County
chosen
Argeș County is an administrative region in southern Romania, known for encompassing part of the Southern Carpathians and including Romania’s highest peak, Moldoveanu.
-
C.
Vâlcea County
Vâlcea County is an administrative region in south-central Romania, known for its mountainous landscapes, spa resorts, and historical monasteries.
-
D.
Suceava County
Suceava County is an administrative region in northeastern Romania, encompassing a large part of the historical and cultural area of Bukovina.
-
E.
Tulcea County
Tulcea County is an administrative region in southeastern Romania, known for encompassing much of the Danube Delta and its rich biodiversity.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b9d5848190a24672775d5c5011 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb42fbc57c81908c6be87bbc547085 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:43 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ccbe994fc881908a43cfdf9f28753c |
completed | April 1, 2026, 6:43 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:32 p.m.