Triple
T8105207
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Judicial Branch of Argentina |
E189209
|
entity |
| Predicate | supremeAppealBodyFor |
P52844
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal cases in Argentina |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal cases in Argentina | Statement: [Judicial Branch of Argentina, supremeAppealBodyFor, federal cases in Argentina]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supremeAppealBodyFor Context triple: [Judicial Branch of Argentina, supremeAppealBodyFor, federal cases in Argentina]
-
A.
highestCourtOfAppealFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the ultimate judicial authority to which decisions from the other entity can be appealed.
-
B.
highestCourtOf
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
C.
supremeCourtOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the highest judicial authority (supreme court) within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
D.
judicialBody
Indicates that an entity serves as a court or tribunal with authority to adjudicate legal disputes or interpret and apply the law.
-
E.
previousHighestCourtOfAppeal
Indicates that one court previously served as the highest court of appeal for another jurisdiction or legal system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b9d5848190a24672775d5c5011 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb42c0ce6481909887be82c8019383 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb04a2ed1c8190b73562321ad688bc |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:31 p.m.