Triple

T8094297
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SNMPv2u E188943 entity
Predicate replacedSecurityApproach P3140 FINISHED
Object community-based LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: community-based | Statement: [SNMPv2u, replacedSecurityApproach, community-based]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: replacedSecurityApproach
Context triple: [SNMPv2u, replacedSecurityApproach, community-based]
  • A. replacedPolicyApproach chosen
    Indicates that one policy approach has been superseded and taken the place of another policy approach.
  • B. securityModelChange
    Indicates that a change has occurred in the security model governing access, permissions, or protection mechanisms between entities.
  • C. securityChangesAfter
    Indicates that the security status or configuration of one entity is modified as a consequence of a prior event or change in another entity.
  • D. hasSecurityConsideration
    Indicates that there is a relevant security-related issue, risk, or precaution associated with the referenced entity.
  • E. securityAspect
    Indicates a relationship where something pertains to, represents, or characterizes a particular aspect or dimension of security.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82b7b3e88190b9041ab0ef28b3cb completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb429089cc81909e4625f9cc7e305f completed March 31, 2026, 3:42 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb04a14cd88190a79ed26cbeec1c33 completed March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:30 p.m.