Triple
T8093353
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | South African general election, 1999 |
E188921
|
entity |
| Predicate | winningPartyVoteShare |
P9216
|
FINISHED |
| Object | approximately 66.4 percent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 66.4 percent | Statement: [South African general election, 1999, winningPartyVoteShare, approximately 66.4 percent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: winningPartyVoteShare Context triple: [South African general election, 1999, winningPartyVoteShare, approximately 66.4 percent]
-
A.
popularVoteShare
chosen
Indicates the proportion of all votes cast in an election that were received by a particular candidate, party, or option.
-
B.
AlliancePopularVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes received by a political alliance in an election relative to all valid votes cast.
-
C.
republicanPopularVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes in an election that were cast for the Republican Party.
-
D.
secondPartyPopularVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total popular votes received by the second party in an election.
-
E.
voterTurnoutPercentage
Indicates the proportion of eligible or registered voters who actually cast a ballot in a given election, expressed as a percentage.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b7b3e88190b9041ab0ef28b3cb |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb4222b68c81909c8bc326763240d0 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb04a14cd88190a79ed26cbeec1c33 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:30 p.m.