Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Heman Sweatt was ordered admitted to the University of Texas Law School | Statement: [Sweatt v. Painter, resultForPetitioner, Heman Sweatt was ordered admitted to the University of Texas Law School]

Target entity: Heman Sweatt was ordered admitted to the University of Texas Law School
Context triple: [Sweatt v. Painter, resultForPetitioner, Heman Sweatt was ordered admitted to the University of Texas Law School]

• A. Sweatt v. Painter chosen
  Sweatt v. Painter was a landmark 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged racial segregation in higher education and helped lay the groundwork for Brown v. Board of Education.
• B. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents
  McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down racial segregation within a public university’s graduate program, marking an important step toward the desegregation of higher education.
• C. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
  Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
• D. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
  Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
• E. Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan
  Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a state-supported women-only nursing school policy as unconstitutional sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: resultForPetitioner
Context triple: [Sweatt v. Painter, resultForPetitioner, Heman Sweatt was ordered admitted to the University of Texas Law School]

• A. petitioner
  Indicates a relationship where one party formally requests a legal remedy or action from a court or authority.
• B. resultDetermination
  Indicates the process or criteria by which an outcome, decision, or result is established or concluded from given inputs or conditions.
• C. petitionerRole
  Indicates the role or capacity in which a petitioner is acting within a legal or formal proceeding.
• D. legalOutcome chosen
  Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
• E. respondentPosition
  Indicates the role, title, or job position held by a respondent in the context of a survey, study, or inquiry.
• F. None of above.