Triple

T8059021
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Roy Rodgers E188069 entity
Predicate notablePublicFigure P80281 FINISHED
Object false LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: false | Statement: [Roy Rodgers, notablePublicFigure, false]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notablePublicFigure
Context triple: [Roy Rodgers, notablePublicFigure, false]
  • A. notableCulturalFigure
    Indicates that a person holds significant influence or recognition within a culture’s arts, traditions, values, or public life.
  • B. notablePolitician
    Indicates that the subject is a politician who is recognized as notable or significant in a political context.
  • C. notablePersonDiscussed
    Indicates that the subject entity includes or features a discussion about the referenced notable person.
  • D. holderNotableFor
    Indicates that a holder (such as a person or organization) is particularly known or recognized for a specific role, achievement, work, or characteristic.
  • E. notableStar
    Indicates that the subject is a star (or stellar object) that is distinguished or noteworthy in some significant way, such as brightness, fame, or scientific interest, relative to other stars.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82b2f68881908c50560697e210da completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3fa51adc8190b9327441bd8b9fb3 completed March 31, 2026, 3:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb049cd51c8190bb3b0f503e42fa8d completed March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cb14be17208190bb51c3dfcb613f20 completed March 31, 2026, 12:26 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:25 p.m.