Triple

T805211
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ChatGPT Plus E17414 entity
Predicate hasLaunchContext P21229 FINISHED
Object commercialization of ChatGPT LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: commercialization of ChatGPT | Statement: [ChatGPT Plus, hasLaunchContext, commercialization of ChatGPT]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLaunchContext
Context triple: [ChatGPT Plus, hasLaunchContext, commercialization of ChatGPT]
  • A. hasLanguageContext
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or interpreted within a specific language or linguistic context.
  • B. usesLaunchMethod
    Indicates that one entity employs or applies a particular launch method to initiate or start another entity or process.
  • C. hasInitial
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with the first letter or starting character of another entity’s name or value.
  • D. hasDeployment
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or utilizes a specific deployment instance (e.g., of software, a model, or a system) in an operational context.
  • E. hasCodeContext
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or occurs within a particular programming or code-related context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4937ae8a08190b5084a03d532b30e completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ace495348190aec66f35ea90bc89 completed March 1, 2026, 9:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4aa70973c8190adbf08302d1103a9 completed March 1, 2026, 9:06 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4ace369b481908ad69de6de99f5e6 completed March 1, 2026, 9:17 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:38 p.m.