Triple

T8032142
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kanosh E187010 entity
Predicate locatedIn P40 FINISHED
Object Millard County E35776 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Millard County | Statement: [Kanosh, locatedIn, Millard County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Millard County
Context triple: [Kanosh, locatedIn, Millard County]
  • A. Millard County chosen
    Millard County is a largely rural county in central Utah known for its agricultural communities, desert landscapes, and historical sites including portions of the old Mormon pioneer trails.
  • B. Carson County
    Carson County is a rural county in the Texas Panhandle known for its agricultural economy and small-town communities.
  • C. Mineral County
    Mineral County is a rural county in western Nevada known for its mining history, desert landscapes, and the Hawthorne Army Depot.
  • D. Mineral County
    Mineral County is a sparsely populated, heavily forested county in western Montana known for its mountainous terrain, outdoor recreation, and proximity to the Idaho border.
  • E. Curry County
    Curry County is a rural county in eastern New Mexico known for its agricultural economy and the city of Clovis, a regional hub near the Texas border.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82ae2d1081909dbfee42b41db419 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3ef18da48190835454a5eb969da7 completed March 31, 2026, 3:26 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cd340abffc8190bbc17aa9b775a9cb completed April 1, 2026, 3:04 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:22 p.m.