Triple

T8004716
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject South African Constitution of 1983 E186335 entity
Predicate entrenchedPolicy P58432 FINISHED
Object racial segregation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: racial segregation | Statement: [South African Constitution of 1983, entrenchedPolicy, racial segregation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: entrenchedPolicy
Context triple: [South African Constitution of 1983, entrenchedPolicy, racial segregation]
  • A. treatyOrPolicy chosen
    Indicates a formal agreement, treaty, or policy that establishes rules, obligations, or guidelines governing the relationship or behavior between entities.
  • B. advancedPolicyOf
    Indicates that one policy is a more developed, detailed, or progressive version of another policy.
  • C. policyStance
    Indicates the position or viewpoint an entity holds regarding a specific policy or set of policies.
  • D. annexationPolicy
    Indicates a policy or practice of formally incorporating one territory into the jurisdiction or sovereignty of another.
  • E. ordinationPolicy
    Indicates the rules or criteria governing how entities are ordered, ranked, or arranged relative to one another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82aaaf24819084b94d18f699ba53 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3cf5fb588190ada4ec7d8087619c completed March 31, 2026, 3:18 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cb048c9f488190b4fb8917a9c21bc5 completed March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:18 p.m.