Triple

T7987510
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 8174 E185718 entity
Predicate bcpNumber P17884 FINISHED
Object BCP 14 E35652 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: BCP 14 | Statement: [RFC 8174, bcpNumber, BCP 14]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: BCP 14
Context triple: [RFC 8174, bcpNumber, BCP 14]
  • A. BCP 14 chosen
    BCP 14 is an IETF Best Current Practice document that standardizes the use of requirement-level keywords like “MUST,” “SHOULD,” and “MAY” in technical specifications.
  • B. BCP 38
    BCP 38 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Best Current Practice that recommends network ingress filtering to prevent IP address spoofing and reduce the impact of denial-of-service attacks.
  • C. BCP 195
    BCP 195 is an IETF Best Current Practice document that provides modern security recommendations for the use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram TLS (DTLS) in Internet protocols.
  • D. BCP 175
    BCP 175 is an IETF Best Current Practice document that defines procedures and policies for managing the DNS root zone’s trust anchor for DNSSEC.
  • E. RFC 1654
    RFC 1654 is an early Internet standards document that specifies the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) for transmitting network layer datagrams over serial point-to-point links.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca829a2cfc819083d591d58ec04075 completed March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3c4d11b08190aa13afb17155462c completed March 31, 2026, 3:15 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cbe0ed61588190b01423061acfce49 completed March 31, 2026, 2:57 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:15 p.m.