Triple
T7976942
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cloud SQL |
E185470
|
entity |
| Predicate | isFullyManaged |
P80108
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Cloud SQL, isFullyManaged, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isFullyManaged Context triple: [Cloud SQL, isFullyManaged, true]
-
A.
isManagedFor
Indicates that one entity is administered, overseen, or controlled on behalf of another entity or purpose.
-
B.
isPassivelyManaged
Indicates that an entity (such as a fund or portfolio) is managed according to a passive strategy that tracks a benchmark or index rather than using active selection or frequent trading.
-
C.
isOftenManagedBy
Indicates that an entity is frequently or typically overseen, directed, or administered by another entity.
-
D.
notManagedBy
Indicates that an entity is explicitly not under the control, supervision, or administrative responsibility of the specified manager or managing entity.
-
E.
hasLocalManagement
Indicates that an entity is managed, administered, or overseen by an authority or management structure located within the same local area or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca829851908190b4e03829353ee7c3 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3bf716508190b4245bd5d89ae8c4 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb047a8e4c81909b79e0f0bf56440c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cb14bbbacc81909c6cf8ec35314bbb |
completed | March 31, 2026, 12:26 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:14 p.m.