Triple

T7935499
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CRADA E184278 entity
Predicate enablingLegislation P18952 FINISHED
Object Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 E5660 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 | Statement: [CRADA, enablingLegislation, Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986
Context triple: [CRADA, enablingLegislation, Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986]
  • A. Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 chosen
    The Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 is a U.S. law that strengthened and formalized the process for federal laboratories to collaborate with industry and transfer government-developed technologies into the private sector.
  • B. Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980
    The Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 is a U.S. federal law designed to promote the transfer of technology from federal laboratories to the private sector and encourage innovation and commercialization of federally funded research.
  • C. Bayh–Dole Act
    The Bayh–Dole Act is a landmark 1980 U.S. law that allows universities, small businesses, and other institutions to retain ownership of inventions developed with federal funding, spurring technology transfer and commercialization.
  • D. National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976
    The National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976 is a U.S. federal law that established a coordinated national framework for science and technology policy and created the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.
  • E. Clinger–Cohen Act of 1996
    The Clinger–Cohen Act of 1996 is a U.S. federal law that reformed how the government acquires, manages, and uses information technology by emphasizing performance-based management and the establishment of agency Chief Information Officers.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: enablingLegislation
Context triple: [CRADA, enablingLegislation, Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986]
  • A. enablingLegislationFor
    Indicates that one piece of legislation provides the legal authority, framework, or permission necessary for another law, program, or action to exist or operate.
  • B. relatedLegislation
    Indicates that there exists a legislative document that is connected to, affects, or is otherwise relevant to the subject entity.
  • C. legislatureAffected
    Indicates that an action, event, or measure has an impact on a legislative body or its functioning.
  • D. legislatedUnder chosen
    Indicates that a law, regulation, or policy was created, enacted, or established according to the authority, framework, or provisions of a specific higher-level law or legal regime.
  • E. significantLegislation
    Indicates that a piece of legislation has substantial importance or impact within a legal, political, or social context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8290c21c8190906a5ca6fe2b03c4 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3aec394081909a9569c02ac372af completed March 31, 2026, 3:09 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cb5c0791e48190af18299c22f6a804 completed March 31, 2026, 5:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae9335f288190ba96781fd6576a2b completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:08 p.m.