Triple

T7933684
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject OpenDocument format E184239 entity
Predicate primaryFormulaFormat P79857 FINISHED
Object .odf LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: .odf | Statement: [OpenDocument format, primaryFormulaFormat, .odf]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: primaryFormulaFormat
Context triple: [OpenDocument format, primaryFormulaFormat, .odf]
  • A. keyFormula
    Indicates that a formula serves as the primary or defining expression associated with an entity or relationship.
  • B. hasChemicalFormula
    Indicates that one entity (typically a chemical substance) is characterized by or associated with a specific chemical formula representing its elemental composition.
  • C. standardFormUsedIn
    Indicates that a particular standard form is employed or applied within a given context, process, or system.
  • D. standardFormulation
    Indicates that something is expressed or represented in a conventional, officially accepted, or commonly used form or version.
  • E. recitesFormula
    Indicates that one entity verbally or mentally repeats a specific formula, such as a set phrase, equation, or ritual wording, typically from memory.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8290c21c8190906a5ca6fe2b03c4 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3aeb132c8190bea4906aaf51b869 completed March 31, 2026, 3:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae9335f288190ba96781fd6576a2b completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69caf7882b048190baa333af9f698590 completed March 30, 2026, 10:22 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:08 p.m.