Triple
T7933110
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Artifact Registry |
E184228
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsFormat |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | APT |
E192870
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: APT | Statement: [Artifact Registry, supportsFormat, APT]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: APT Context triple: [Artifact Registry, supportsFormat, APT]
-
A.
APT
chosen
APT is a widely used command-line package management tool for installing, updating, and removing software on Debian-based Linux systems.
-
B.
APT-P
APT-P was the experimental tilting prototype of British Rail’s Advanced Passenger Train, built to test high-speed rail technology in the 1970s–80s.
-
C.
APT-E
APT-E was an experimental British tilting high-speed train prototype developed in the 1970s to test advanced technologies for the Advanced Passenger Train program.
-
D.
APT-S
APT-S was a proposed production variant of British Rail’s experimental tilting Advanced Passenger Train, intended for regular high-speed passenger service.
-
E.
arp
Arp is the ISO 639-3 language code for the Arapaho language, an Algonquian language spoken by the Arapaho people of the United States.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8290c21c8190906a5ca6fe2b03c4 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3acfd2a88190b1a13cd6fdedc272 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:09 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cb5c041e588190bfbf251ed88d5bcd |
completed | March 31, 2026, 5:30 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:08 p.m.