Triple
T7928549
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 4271 |
E184128
|
entity |
| Predicate | obsoletes |
P101
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
RFC 1771
RFC 1771 is an early specification of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP-4) used for inter-domain routing on the Internet, later superseded by RFC 4271.
|
E708267
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1771 | Statement: [RFC 4271, obsoletes, RFC 1771]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1771 Context triple: [RFC 4271, obsoletes, RFC 1771]
-
A.
RFC 1661
RFC 1661 is the original specification of the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP), defining a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links.
-
B.
RFC 1657
RFC 1657 is an early Internet standards document that defined SNMPv2 Management Information Base (MIB) extensions for managing BGP-4 routing protocol implementations.
-
C.
RFC 1667
RFC 1667 is an early Internet standards document that was later superseded by RFC 1901 as the protocol specification evolved.
-
D.
RFC 1670
RFC 1670 is an early Internet standards document related to network protocols that was later superseded by RFC 1901.
-
E.
RFC 1497
RFC 1497 is an early Internet standards document that defined vendor-specific extensions for the BOOTP protocol, laying groundwork later incorporated into DHCP.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: RFC 1771 Triple: [RFC 4271, obsoletes, RFC 1771]
Generated description
RFC 1771 is an early specification of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP-4) used for inter-domain routing on the Internet, later superseded by RFC 4271.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1771 Target entity description: RFC 1771 is an early specification of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP-4) used for inter-domain routing on the Internet, later superseded by RFC 4271.
-
A.
RFC 1661
RFC 1661 is the original specification of the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP), defining a standard method for transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links.
-
B.
RFC 1657
RFC 1657 is an early Internet standards document that defined SNMPv2 Management Information Base (MIB) extensions for managing BGP-4 routing protocol implementations.
-
C.
RFC 1667
RFC 1667 is an early Internet standards document that was later superseded by RFC 1901 as the protocol specification evolved.
-
D.
RFC 1670
RFC 1670 is an early Internet standards document related to network protocols that was later superseded by RFC 1901.
-
E.
RFC 1497
RFC 1497 is an early Internet standards document that defined vendor-specific extensions for the BOOTP protocol, laying groundwork later incorporated into DHCP.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828fe7bc819090f52c88dcd72183 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3ac9ac4c819082cd2190fc3ce5a2 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cc5643fd3081908fc9a413a7920145 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:18 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69cc58a76b90819092de63b3b23e70af |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:28 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69cc5cfccc9c8190adcbaee96c17711e |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:07 p.m.