Triple
T7928217
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RSET |
E184120
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducedIn |
P513
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 1939 |
E35265
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1939 | Statement: [RSET, introducedIn, RFC 1939]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1939 Context triple: [RSET, introducedIn, RFC 1939]
-
A.
RFC 1939
chosen
RFC 1939 is the Internet standard document that specifies the Post Office Protocol version 3 (POP3) used for retrieving email from a mail server.
-
B.
RFC 1909
RFC 1909 is an older Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments document that was later superseded by RFC 3410 as part of the evolution of network management standards.
-
C.
RFC 1659
RFC 1659 is an early Internet standards document that specified the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) version 2 over OSI transport mappings before being superseded by later revisions.
-
D.
RFC 1889
RFC 1889 was the original specification of the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) for delivering audio and video over IP networks, later obsoleted by updated standards.
-
E.
RFC 1869
RFC 1869 is an early Internet standard that introduced the Extended Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (ESMTP) framework for adding optional extensions to SMTP.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828fe7bc819090f52c88dcd72183 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3ac9ac4c819082cd2190fc3ce5a2 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cc5643fd3081908fc9a413a7920145 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 11:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:07 p.m.