Triple
T7913557
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brda River |
E183759
|
entity |
| Predicate | flowsThrough |
P225
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bydgoszcz |
E390387
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bydgoszcz | Statement: [Brda River, flowsThrough, Bydgoszcz]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bydgoszcz Context triple: [Brda River, flowsThrough, Bydgoszcz]
-
A.
Bydgoszcz
chosen
Bydgoszcz is a major city in northern Poland known as an important economic, cultural, and academic center on the Brda and Vistula rivers.
-
B.
Gdańsk
Gdańsk is a major Polish port city on the Baltic Sea, known for its rich Hanseatic history, shipyards, and role in the origins of the Solidarity movement.
-
C.
Szczecin
Szczecin is a large Polish city and important maritime and industrial center in northwestern Poland, situated near the Baltic Sea and the German border.
-
D.
Olsztyn
Olsztyn is a historic city in northern Poland known for its medieval architecture, lakes, and role as the capital of the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship.
-
E.
Gdynia
Gdynia is a major seaport city on Poland’s Baltic coast, developed rapidly in the 20th century into one of the country’s key maritime and economic centers.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828dec0c81908b8f55a4dbbb53ff |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3a748f4c8190bcd868de2fcf0b3a |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:07 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d19f4a2bd881909745f349d847ca87 |
completed | April 4, 2026, 11:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:04 p.m.