Triple
T79093
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent |
E1586
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007) |
E1586
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007) | Statement: [Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent, partOf, Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007) Context triple: [Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent, partOf, Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007)]
-
A.
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent
chosen
The Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent is Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s influential Supreme Court opinion criticizing restrictive limits on pay discrimination claims and helping spur the passage of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
-
B.
Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council
Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a Massachusetts law restricting state business with Burma was preempted by federal sanctions under the Supremacy Clause.
-
C.
Steward Machine Co. v. Davis
Steward Machine Co. v. Davis is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal unemployment compensation provisions of the Social Security Act, affirming broad congressional power to tax and spend for the general welfare.
-
D.
United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion
The United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion is a landmark Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that struck down the Virginia Military Institute’s male-only admissions policy as unconstitutional sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.
-
E.
Wickard v. Filburn
Wickard v. Filburn is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded federal regulatory power by holding that even purely local, non-commercial activity could be regulated under the Commerce Clause if it had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24c60d19c8190a1b6c105ca59ef5b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24f335b5c8190bf2158d884890ac2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a255522b0081909f8a02667108a6d3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:39 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:06 a.m.