Triple

T79061
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion E1585 entity
Predicate conclusion P374 FINISHED
Object Virginia’s justifications for excluding women from VMI are insufficient under the Equal Protection Clause LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Virginia’s justifications for excluding women from VMI are insufficient under the Equal Protection Clause | Statement: [United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion, conclusion, Virginia’s justifications for excluding women from VMI are insufficient under the Equal Protection Clause]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conclusion
Context triple: [United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion, conclusion, Virginia’s justifications for excluding women from VMI are insufficient under the Equal Protection Clause]
  • A. concluded
    Indicates that an entity has brought an event, process, discussion, or agreement to an end, often after reaching a decision or final judgment.
  • B. concludedBy
    Indicates that an event, process, or state is brought to an end or finalized by a specific agent or entity.
  • C. concludedAt
    Indicates the point in time at which an event, process, or relationship comes to an end or is completed.
  • D. result chosen
    Indicates that one entity is produced, caused, or brought about as an outcome or consequence of another entity or process.
  • E. after
    Indicates that one event, state, or action occurs later in time than another, following it in temporal order.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24c60d19c8190a1b6c105ca59ef5b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a24fd16c248190a6ee4cd96c388772 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24eb126b48190b410b859c1be99aa completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:06 a.m.