Triple

T7904102
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Flag of Tamaulipas E183527 entity
Predicate alignmentWithNationalFlag P79689 FINISHED
Object shares national tricolor pattern LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: shares national tricolor pattern | Statement: [Flag of Tamaulipas, alignmentWithNationalFlag, shares national tricolor pattern]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alignmentWithNationalFlag
Context triple: [Flag of Tamaulipas, alignmentWithNationalFlag, shares national tricolor pattern]
  • A. useNationalFlag
    Indicates that an entity employs or displays the national flag in a particular context or for a specific purpose.
  • B. orientationInFlag
    Indicates the spatial orientation or alignment of an entity as it appears within a flag.
  • C. nationalFlag
    Indicates that one entity is the official national flag representing the other entity (a country or nation).
  • D. isOnFlagOf
    Indicates that something (typically a symbol, image, or design element) appears on or is depicted on a flag.
  • E. similarToFlagOf
    Indicates that one entity’s flag resembles or closely matches the design, colors, or symbols of another entity’s flag.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca828d13088190b222be7aa9f9315c completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3a4331cc8190b50301c78767a850 completed March 31, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae92f9498819085277879e59aa072 completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69caf7882b048190baa333af9f698590 completed March 30, 2026, 10:22 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:02 p.m.