Triple
T7898445
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Handlebars |
E183388
|
entity |
| Predicate | exampleUnescapedSyntax |
P76879
|
FINISHED |
| Object | {{{variable}}} |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: {{{variable}}} | Statement: [Handlebars, exampleUnescapedSyntax, {{{variable}}}]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exampleUnescapedSyntax
Context triple: [Handlebars, exampleUnescapedSyntax, {{{variable}}}]
-
A.
escapedBy
Indicates that an entity is freed or enabled to escape through the actions or intervention of another entity.
-
B.
escapeBehavior
Indicates a relationship where an entity actively attempts to avoid, flee from, or get away from another entity, situation, or constraint.
-
C.
definesSyntax
Indicates that one entity specifies or determines the formal structure, rules, or grammar by which another entity is expressed or interpreted.
-
D.
laterVersionSyntax
Indicates that one syntax form is a newer or more updated version of another syntax form.
-
E.
syntaxElement
chosen
Indicates a relationship where something functions as a syntactic unit or component within a larger grammatical or structural expression.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828d13088190b222be7aa9f9315c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3a2ae5048190a6824d34b582c366 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae92d94448190b4425bbfb64c658c |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:01 p.m.