Triple

T7898438
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Handlebars E183388 entity
Predicate exampleSyntax P30248 FINISHED
Object {{variable}} LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: {{variable}} | Statement: [Handlebars, exampleSyntax, {{variable}}]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exampleSyntax
Context triple: [Handlebars, exampleSyntax, {{variable}}]
  • A. definesSyntax
    Indicates that one entity specifies or determines the formal structure, rules, or grammar by which another entity is expressed or interpreted.
  • B. codeExample chosen
    Indicates that one entity provides a snippet or sample of source code that illustrates how to use, implement, or demonstrate another entity.
  • C. exampleType
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representative or illustrative instance of the type or category defined by another entity.
  • D. syntaxBasedOn
    Indicates that the syntactic structure or rules of one entity are derived from, influenced by, or constructed according to the syntax of another entity.
  • E. doctypeSyntax
    Indicates that one entity specifies or conforms to the syntax rules of a document type declaration (DOCTYPE) used in markup languages.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca828d13088190b222be7aa9f9315c completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb3a2ae5048190a6824d34b582c366 completed March 31, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae92d94448190b4425bbfb64c658c completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:01 p.m.