Triple
T7868251
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Taeniopygia |
E182671
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSubgenusStatus |
P32608
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sometimes split into subspecies groups within zebra finch complex |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sometimes split into subspecies groups within zebra finch complex | Statement: [Taeniopygia, hasSubgenusStatus, sometimes split into subspecies groups within zebra finch complex]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSubgenusStatus Context triple: [Taeniopygia, hasSubgenusStatus, sometimes split into subspecies groups within zebra finch complex]
-
A.
hasSubtaxon
chosen
Indicates that one taxonomic group is a subordinate or included taxon within another taxonomic group.
-
B.
hasGenus
Indicates that one entity belongs to, or is classified under, the biological genus represented by the other entity.
-
C.
hasExtantGenus
Indicates that a taxonomic group currently includes at least one genus that is still living (not extinct).
-
D.
belongsToSubfamily
Indicates that one entity is a member of, or classified within, a specific subfamily of another entity.
-
E.
hasSubphylum
Indicates that one biological entity is classified as a subphylum within the broader taxonomic grouping of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82894d9081908a832bfce71a4714 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3847c7fc819098e32b6548943da7 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 2:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae925ca388190ae4a01fa76e957e8 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:55 p.m.