Triple
T7855616
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Manggarai people |
E182166
|
entity |
| Predicate | textileTradition |
P5963
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ikat weaving |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ikat weaving | Statement: [Manggarai people, textileTradition, ikat weaving]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: textileTradition Context triple: [Manggarai people, textileTradition, ikat weaving]
-
A.
textileFeature
Indicates a characteristic, property, or notable aspect associated with a textile or fabric.
-
B.
textileType
Indicates the specific kind or category of textile material associated with an entity.
-
C.
traditionalCraft
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or practices a craft or skill that is rooted in long-established, culturally transmitted traditions.
-
D.
sharesDesignTraditionWith
Indicates that two entities originate from or participate in the same design tradition, sharing common stylistic principles, methods, or heritage.
-
E.
weavingCenter
Indicates that an entity serves as a central place or hub where weaving activities are carried out or coordinated.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82869ee08190b8f9040dbc2c0467 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb1a74592c8190b42f298e3e33617b |
completed | March 31, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae92180f88190ae3d44c3de7adc93 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:52 p.m.