Triple

T7829914
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Manchester Arena Inquiry E181339 entity
Predicate reportSubject P11603 FINISHED
Object security arrangements at the Arena (Volume 1) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: security arrangements at the Arena (Volume 1) | Statement: [Manchester Arena Inquiry, reportSubject, security arrangements at the Arena (Volume 1)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reportSubject
Context triple: [Manchester Arena Inquiry, reportSubject, security arrangements at the Arena (Volume 1)]
  • A. finalReportSubject chosen
    Indicates that an entity serves as the main topic or focus of a final report.
  • B. reportType
    Indicates the specific category or kind of report associated with an entity or action.
  • C. reportsThrough
    Indicates that one entity formally communicates and is accountable to another entity through an established reporting or supervisory chain.
  • D. reportPublisher
    Indicates that one entity is the organization or individual responsible for publishing a given report.
  • E. reportsWithin
    Indicates that one entity submits or delivers a report to another entity within a specified time frame or boundary.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca8282ccec819083c48efb72d21cf9 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb04ac013c81909533fa348776f50c completed March 30, 2026, 11:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae91ae008819098e56bbe51143b31 completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:44 p.m.