Triple
T782556
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Samuel Sewall |
E16528
|
entity |
| Predicate | confessedFor |
P19849
|
FINISHED |
| Object | errors in the Salem witch trials |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: errors in the Salem witch trials | Statement: [Samuel Sewall, confessedFor, errors in the Salem witch trials]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: confessedFor Context triple: [Samuel Sewall, confessedFor, errors in the Salem witch trials]
-
A.
confessedAs
Indicates that one entity has admitted or acknowledged being or doing something, typically revealing guilt, identity, or involvement in relation to another entity.
-
B.
confessedTo
Indicates that one entity admitted guilt or revealed the truth about an action, wrongdoing, or secret to another entity.
-
C.
associatedConfession
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to a specific confession, admission, or statement acknowledging guilt or responsibility.
-
D.
usesConfession
Indicates that one entity employs or relies on a confession (typically an admission of guilt or wrongdoing) as part of its actions or reasoning toward another entity or outcome.
-
E.
usesConfessions
Indicates that one entity employs or relies on another entity’s confessions as a basis for some action, decision, or outcome.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4936ad1fc81908f190208059ccf78 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a90365648190ace53b0f0e87aa68 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a50bd23081908908235b8ec9201e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4a8f09d108190b8c83a6169d65c0c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.