Triple
T7815098
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pishin Valley |
E180984
|
entity |
| Predicate | irrigationMethod |
P5694
|
FINISHED |
| Object | canal irrigation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: canal irrigation | Statement: [Pishin Valley, irrigationMethod, canal irrigation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: irrigationMethod Context triple: [Pishin Valley, irrigationMethod, canal irrigation]
-
A.
usedIrrigation
Indicates that an entity applied or employed an irrigation system or method to supply water to land or crops.
-
B.
hasIrrigation
chosen
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or benefits from an irrigation system supplying water.
-
C.
irrigates
Indicates that one entity supplies water to another, typically land or crops, for the purpose of supporting growth or maintaining moisture.
-
D.
usedIrrigationFrom
Indicates that one entity applied or relied on irrigation resources, systems, or methods originating from another entity.
-
E.
irrigationProjectIn
Indicates that an irrigation project is located within or implemented in a specified geographic or administrative area.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca828153f48190bdb27ac46f8e0745 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69caf96c009c81909726e1653b6f1348 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 10:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae91687788190af9cb7aaa996d291 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:39 p.m.