Triple
T781411
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle of Tassafaronga |
E16503
|
entity |
| Predicate | JapaneseAdvantage |
P19841
|
FINISHED |
| Object | superior torpedoes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: superior torpedoes | Statement: [Battle of Tassafaronga, JapaneseAdvantage, superior torpedoes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: JapaneseAdvantage Context triple: [Battle of Tassafaronga, JapaneseAdvantage, superior torpedoes]
-
A.
nameInJapaneseKana
Indicates that an entity’s name is written or represented using Japanese kana characters.
-
B.
kanji
Indicates that an entity is written in, represented by, or associated with a specific kanji character or set of kanji characters.
-
C.
usesKatakanaFor
Indicates that one entity is written or represented using katakana script in relation to another entity.
-
D.
usesKanjiFrom
Indicates that one writing system, word, or text incorporates or is composed of kanji characters originating from another specified source.
-
E.
hasOfficialNameInJapanese
Indicates that an entity has an official, formally recognized name expressed in the Japanese language.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4936ad1fc81908f190208059ccf78 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a90365648190ace53b0f0e87aa68 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a50bd23081908908235b8ec9201e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4a8f09d108190b8c83a6169d65c0c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.