Triple

T7809653
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Cat's-Paw E180644 entity
Predicate hasHaroldLloydFeature P79139 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [The Cat's-Paw, hasHaroldLloydFeature, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHaroldLloydFeature
Context triple: [The Cat's-Paw, hasHaroldLloydFeature, yes]
  • A. hasGingerRogersRole
    Indicates that an entity is assigned or associated with a role specifically identified as the "Ginger Rogers" role in a given context or production.
  • B. hasChapmanCode
    Indicates that an entity (typically a geographic or administrative area) is associated with a specific Chapman code used for standardized location identification.
  • C. hasDirectorCameo
    Indicates that the director of a work appears in a cameo role within that same work.
  • D. hasInteractiveFilm
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, offers, or features an interactive film experience.
  • E. hasStuntDouble
    Indicates that one entity serves as a stunt double who performs dangerous or physically demanding actions on behalf of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca827f6f148190beca4e245b993506 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69caf78bb4b08190b2b3b51c5a0a033c completed March 30, 2026, 10:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cae91687788190af9cb7aaa996d291 completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69caf7855a3c81908b9318f7186fc0c0 completed March 30, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:37 p.m.