Triple

T7807898
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists E180601 entity
Predicate citedInCase P4420 FINISHED
Object Reynolds v. United States E5191 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Reynolds v. United States | Statement: [Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists, citedInCase, Reynolds v. United States]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Reynolds v. United States
Context triple: [Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists, citedInCase, Reynolds v. United States]
  • A. Reynolds v. United States chosen
    Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
  • B. Rainey v. United States
    Rainey v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the scope of Congress’s power to impose taxes under the Constitution’s Origination Clause.
  • C. Wright v. United States
    Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
  • D. Yates v. United States
    Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
  • E. Gall v. United States
    Gall v. United States is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified federal sentencing discretion by holding that appellate courts must review all sentences, including those outside the Sentencing Guidelines, under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca827f6f148190beca4e245b993506 completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69caf63b3ebc819088dcf4c58b80b18a completed March 30, 2026, 10:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cb145b93788190a89f26dacbd0b437 completed March 31, 2026, 12:24 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:36 p.m.