Triple
T7806984
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vallenar |
E180579
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableMiningResource |
P64308
|
FINISHED |
| Object | copper |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: copper | Statement: [Vallenar, notableMiningResource, copper]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableMiningResource Context triple: [Vallenar, notableMiningResource, copper]
-
A.
hasImportantMineral
Indicates that an entity contains or is associated with a mineral considered significant or valuable in a given context.
-
B.
naturalResources
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is a source of natural resources for another entity.
-
C.
hasGeologicResource
Indicates that an entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a particular geologic resource.
-
D.
economicGeology
Indicates a relationship where geological features, materials, or processes are studied or evaluated in terms of their economic value, such as for resource exploration, extraction, or utilization.
-
E.
hasMiningCommodity
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, produces, or contains a specific mining-related commodity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca827f6f148190beca4e245b993506 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69caf78a6d88819093f83528fe88b182 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 10:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cae91687788190af9cb7aaa996d291 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:35 p.m.