Triple

T7792091
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Public Law 88-352 E180203 entity
Predicate subjectOf P38 FINISHED
Object Katzenbach v. McClung E9688 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Katzenbach v. McClung | Statement: [Public Law 88-352, subjectOf, Katzenbach v. McClung]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Katzenbach v. McClung
Context triple: [Public Law 88-352, subjectOf, Katzenbach v. McClung]
  • A. Katzenbach v. McClung chosen
    Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • B. Katzenbach v. Morgan
    Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
  • C. South Carolina v. Katzenbach
    South Carolina v. Katzenbach is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, affirming broad federal power to combat racial discrimination in voting.
  • D. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • E. Wesberry v. Sanders
    Wesberry v. Sanders is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle that congressional districts must be drawn so that each person's vote is as equal in weight as practicable, laying groundwork for the "one person, one vote" standard.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca827d22208190b4dc5aa680edcf5d completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cae938714c8190b89917e6ded004da completed March 30, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cb13cdb4288190ae3cfe1ee4e3e496 completed March 31, 2026, 12:22 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 4:30 p.m.