Triple

T776409
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cochinchina E16394 entity
Predicate colonialPolicy P1829 FINISHED
Object direct French rule LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: direct French rule | Statement: [Cochinchina, colonialPolicy, direct French rule]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colonialPolicy
Context triple: [Cochinchina, colonialPolicy, direct French rule]
  • A. colonialOffshoot
    Indicates that one entity originated as a colony or derivative settlement established by another entity.
  • B. colonialLegacy
    Indicates the enduring influence or consequences of a past colonial relationship that continue to shape interactions or conditions between entities.
  • C. hadColonialAdministrationType chosen
    Indicates the specific form or system of colonial governance that was exercised over a territory or population.
  • D. hasColonialHistoryWith
    Indicates that one entity has a historical relationship of colonization or being colonized involving the other entity.
  • E. preColonialStatus
    Indicates the condition, role, or social-political standing an entity held prior to the onset of colonial rule.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49369a0848190af883934cee3db4c completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a74da7648190adfad56717d564df completed March 1, 2026, 8:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4a50a443481909ae3662764ee69a4 completed March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.