Triple
T775151
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz |
E16370
|
entity |
| Predicate | developedNotation |
P73
|
FINISHED |
| Object | integral sign ∫ |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: integral sign ∫ | Statement: [Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, developedNotation, integral sign ∫]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developedNotation Context triple: [Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, developedNotation, integral sign ∫]
-
A.
distinguishingNotation
Indicates that one entity uses a specific notation or symbol to distinguish or differentiate another entity from similar ones.
-
B.
typicalNotation
Indicates that one entity is the standard or commonly used symbolic representation (notation) for another entity.
-
C.
developed
chosen
Indicates that one entity created, designed, or brought another entity into a more advanced or complete state through effort or work.
-
D.
notation
Indicates a conventional way of symbolically representing or writing something, such as concepts, quantities, or operations, within a specific system.
-
E.
notationType
Indicates the specific system or style of notation used to represent or encode something (such as music, math, or language).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49369a0848190af883934cee3db4c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a74da7648190adfad56717d564df |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a50a443481909ae3662764ee69a4 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.