Triple

T7731031
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Diane Monson E175251 entity
Predicate opposedBy P437 FINISHED
Object United States federal government in Gonzales v. Raich E8365 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States federal government in Gonzales v. Raich | Statement: [Diane Monson, opposedBy, United States federal government in Gonzales v. Raich]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States federal government in Gonzales v. Raich
Context triple: [Diane Monson, opposedBy, United States federal government in Gonzales v. Raich]
  • A. Gonzales v. Raich chosen
    Gonzales v. Raich is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal power to prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana under the Commerce Clause, even when states permit it for medical purposes.
  • B. Arizona v. United States
    Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
  • C. United States v. Lopez
    United States v. Lopez is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked the first time in decades the Court struck down a federal law for exceeding Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause, signaling a revival of limits on federal regulatory authority.
  • D. United States v. Butler
    United States v. Butler was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down key provisions of the New Deal’s Agricultural Adjustment Act as an unconstitutional use of federal taxing and spending power.
  • E. Wickard v. Filburn
    Wickard v. Filburn is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded federal regulatory power by holding that even purely local, non-commercial activity could be regulated under the Commerce Clause if it had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6995e912c81909a49a2657103f786 completed March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c703358cf881909df8496d943d6de7 completed March 27, 2026, 10:22 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c8b52e176481908595fea4ace7a607 completed March 29, 2026, 5:14 a.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:06 p.m.