Triple

T7730516
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Manda E175236 entity
Predicate hasAlternateNameType P65356 FINISHED
Object lesser-known Dravidian language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lesser-known Dravidian language | Statement: [Manda, hasAlternateNameType, lesser-known Dravidian language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAlternateNameType
Context triple: [Manda, hasAlternateNameType, lesser-known Dravidian language]
  • A. hasAlternateMemberType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a different or substitute type of member than its primary or standard member type.
  • B. hasAlternativeReferent chosen
    Indicates that an entity can also be referred to or identified by an alternative name, label, or reference.
  • C. hasAlternativeNameOfOrder
    Indicates that one entity is an alternative or variant name used to refer to the same order as the other entity.
  • D. hasTitleHolderAlternativeName
    Indicates that an entity serving as a title holder is known by an alternative or additional name.
  • E. hasAlternativeNameForSameCity
    Indicates that one city name is an alternative or variant name referring to the same city as another name.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6995e912c81909a49a2657103f786 completed March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c7074eca4c8190bd51fd1b450729e8 completed March 27, 2026, 10:40 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c7016a6cf88190b53bf4b958f0f302 completed March 27, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:06 p.m.