Triple
T7707678
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Concord, Alabama |
E174661
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNearbyCity |
P350
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hueytown, Alabama |
E22232
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hueytown, Alabama | Statement: [Concord, Alabama, hasNearbyCity, Hueytown, Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hueytown, Alabama Context triple: [Concord, Alabama, hasNearbyCity, Hueytown, Alabama]
-
A.
Hueytown, Alabama
chosen
Hueytown, Alabama is a suburban city in Jefferson County known for its ties to the Birmingham area and its rich stock car racing heritage.
-
B.
Townley, Alabama
Townley, Alabama is a small unincorporated community located in Walker County in the north-central part of the state.
-
C.
Huguley, Alabama
Huguley, Alabama is a small unincorporated community located in eastern Alabama near the Georgia state line.
-
D.
Hammondville, Alabama
Hammondville, Alabama is a small unincorporated community located in northeastern Alabama’s DeKalb County, near the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains.
-
E.
Huxford, Alabama
Huxford, Alabama is a small unincorporated rural community located in Escambia County in the southern part of the state.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6995b3e8c8190833108f883d5f53c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c702aadea08190bf827f5d51535224 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:20 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c9a9ca03ec8190859d9728fef39d24 |
completed | March 29, 2026, 10:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:04 p.m.