Triple
T7699478
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mysia |
E174451
|
entity |
| Predicate | ethnonym |
P4709
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mysian |
E682884
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mysian | Statement: [Mysia, ethnonym, Mysian]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mysian Context triple: [Mysia, ethnonym, Mysian]
-
A.
Mysians
chosen
The Mysians were an ancient people of northwestern Anatolia, known from Greek and Roman sources for inhabiting the historical region of Mysia in what is now modern-day Turkey.
-
B.
Lydian
Lydian is an extinct Indo-European language once spoken in the ancient kingdom of Lydia in western Anatolia.
-
C.
Lycian
Lycian is an extinct Indo-European Anatolian language once spoken in southwestern Asia Minor and known from inscriptions dating to the first millennium BCE.
-
D.
Caria
Caria was an ancient region in southwestern Anatolia, known for its coastal cities, distinctive Carian culture, and later integration into the Persian and Hellenistic worlds.
-
E.
Lycia
Lycia was an ancient region on the southwestern coast of Anatolia, known for its distinctive Lycian civilization, rock-cut tombs, and later incorporation into Greek and Roman spheres.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6995a72cc8190998e56daa6f8e453 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c7026ba7b48190a18f1c1cbbf1b944 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c8b50049f88190b4cd5cf692d0a3b1 |
completed | March 29, 2026, 5:13 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 4:03 p.m.