Triple
T76726
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fiat Lux |
E1532
|
entity |
| Predicate | scriptureAllusion |
P4828
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Genesis 1:3 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Genesis 1:3 | Statement: [Fiat Lux, scriptureAllusion, Genesis 1:3]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: scriptureAllusion Context triple: [Fiat Lux, scriptureAllusion, Genesis 1:3]
-
A.
scripturalBasis
Indicates that one entity serves as the religious or scriptural foundation, support, or justification for another entity (such as a belief, practice, or doctrine).
-
B.
hasViewOnScripture
Indicates that an entity holds a particular interpretive stance or doctrinal position regarding scripture.
-
C.
sharesScriptureWith
Indicates that one entity communicates or distributes religious or scriptural texts to another entity.
-
D.
hasLanguageOfScripture
Indicates that an entity’s scriptural or sacred texts are written or expressed in a specified language.
-
E.
religiousElement
Indicates that something is a component, aspect, or feature associated with a religion or religious practice.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24c60d19c8190a1b6c105ca59ef5b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2559892dc81909303f2eefdc0025f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24eaf99e481908e8d314577e22ecf |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a25597b6c48190849c3e9e6351b983 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:06 a.m.