Triple

T766250
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject General Welfare Clause doctrine E16180 entity
Predicate clarifiedIn P13052 FINISHED
Object Helvering v. Davis (1937) E954 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Helvering v. Davis (1937) | Statement: [General Welfare Clause doctrine, clarifiedIn, Helvering v. Davis (1937)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Helvering v. Davis (1937)
Context triple: [General Welfare Clause doctrine, clarifiedIn, Helvering v. Davis (1937)]
  • A. Helvering v. Davis chosen
    Helvering v. Davis is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act and broadly affirmed federal power to tax and spend for the general welfare.
  • B. Helvering v. Horst
    Helvering v. Horst is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that established key principles of the assignment of income doctrine in federal tax law.
  • C. Helvering v. Gregory
    Helvering v. Gregory is a landmark 1935 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that transactions must have a genuine business purpose beyond tax avoidance to be respected for tax purposes.
  • D. Helvering v. Clifford
    Helvering v. Clifford is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that clarified when income from a trust should be attributed to the grantor for federal income tax purposes.
  • E. Helvering v. Bruun
    Helvering v. Bruun is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether a landlord realizes taxable income when repossessing property improved by a tenant.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493684ee48190bd43b7c78da4aec8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4aa9cecd08190a23c9f65080a4ac7 completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a66d994aa081908b748544f5d7f6ed completed March 3, 2026, 5:11 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.