Triple
T7661934
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of Nepal |
E173525
|
entity |
| Predicate | appointmentRecommendationBy |
P5662
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Judicial Council of Nepal
The Judicial Council of Nepal is a constitutional body responsible for recommending appointments, transfers, and disciplinary actions of judges to ensure an independent and accountable judiciary.
|
E683212
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Judicial Council of Nepal | Statement: [Supreme Court of Nepal, appointmentRecommendationBy, Judicial Council of Nepal]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Judicial Council of Nepal Context triple: [Supreme Court of Nepal, appointmentRecommendationBy, Judicial Council of Nepal]
-
A.
Judiciary of Nepal
The Judiciary of Nepal is the independent system of courts and judges responsible for interpreting the constitution, administering justice, and resolving legal disputes within Nepal.
-
B.
Supreme Court of Nepal
The Supreme Court of Nepal is the highest judicial authority in Nepal, serving as the final court of appeal and the guardian of the country’s constitution and legal system.
-
C.
Federal Parliament of Nepal
The Federal Parliament of Nepal is the country’s bicameral national legislature, responsible for making federal laws and overseeing the executive branch.
-
D.
National Judicial Council
The National Judicial Council is a constitutional body in Nigeria responsible for recommending judicial appointments, exercising disciplinary control over judges, and safeguarding the independence and integrity of the judiciary.
-
E.
judicial branch of Nepal
The judicial branch of Nepal is the independent system of courts, headed by the Supreme Court, responsible for interpreting the constitution, administering justice, and resolving legal disputes within the country.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Judicial Council of Nepal Triple: [Supreme Court of Nepal, appointmentRecommendationBy, Judicial Council of Nepal]
Generated description
The Judicial Council of Nepal is a constitutional body responsible for recommending appointments, transfers, and disciplinary actions of judges to ensure an independent and accountable judiciary.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Judicial Council of Nepal Target entity description: The Judicial Council of Nepal is a constitutional body responsible for recommending appointments, transfers, and disciplinary actions of judges to ensure an independent and accountable judiciary.
-
A.
Judiciary of Nepal
The Judiciary of Nepal is the independent system of courts and judges responsible for interpreting the constitution, administering justice, and resolving legal disputes within Nepal.
-
B.
Supreme Court of Nepal
The Supreme Court of Nepal is the highest judicial authority in Nepal, serving as the final court of appeal and the guardian of the country’s constitution and legal system.
-
C.
Federal Parliament of Nepal
The Federal Parliament of Nepal is the country’s bicameral national legislature, responsible for making federal laws and overseeing the executive branch.
-
D.
National Judicial Council
The National Judicial Council is a constitutional body in Nigeria responsible for recommending judicial appointments, exercising disciplinary control over judges, and safeguarding the independence and integrity of the judiciary.
-
E.
judicial branch of Nepal
The judicial branch of Nepal is the independent system of courts, headed by the Supreme Court, responsible for interpreting the constitution, administering justice, and resolving legal disputes within the country.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appointmentRecommendationBy Context triple: [Supreme Court of Nepal, appointmentRecommendationBy, Judicial Council of Nepal]
-
A.
canRecommend
Indicates that one entity is able or authorized to suggest or endorse another entity as suitable or preferable.
-
B.
recommendation
chosen
Indicates that one entity suggests, endorses, or advises another entity as suitable or beneficial for a particular purpose or context.
-
C.
recommendationProcess
Indicates the process by which one entity evaluates options and suggests a preferred choice or course of action to another entity.
-
D.
recommendedLocation
Indicates that one entity suggests or endorses another entity as a suitable or preferred place for a particular purpose or activity.
-
E.
appointmentBy
Indicates that one entity is appointed or designated to a role, position, or task by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69955517c819085bc715b96d304d2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c7061cbc3c8190a917dd7e71214182 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c8ac9527088190b3d7fd0987e66f35 |
completed | March 29, 2026, 4:37 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69c8ae258a7081909bd30259a368d865 |
completed | March 29, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69c8aebc46e481908872d0c4c77345b5 |
completed | March 29, 2026, 4:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c7015dd8fc8190bc5f52a12bd46209 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:14 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:59 p.m.