Triple
T7658681
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alexandria Safe-Zone |
E173448
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDefenses |
P48207
|
FINISHED |
| Object | steel walls |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: steel walls | Statement: [Alexandria Safe-Zone, hasDefenses, steel walls]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDefenses Context triple: [Alexandria Safe-Zone, hasDefenses, steel walls]
-
A.
hasDefenseStrategy
Indicates that an entity employs or is associated with a particular plan or set of measures designed to protect against threats or attacks.
-
B.
hasDefenderStrength
Indicates that an entity possesses a certain level or measure of defensive capability or protective power.
-
C.
canBeDefendedIn
Indicates that something (such as a claim, action, or position) is capable of being justified or supported within a specified context, forum, or framework.
-
D.
hasDefensiveWork
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a work focused on defense or protective functions.
-
E.
defensiveCapability
chosen
Indicates the ability or capacity of an entity to protect itself or others against threats, attacks, or harm.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69955517c819085bc715b96d304d2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c7061cbc3c8190a917dd7e71214182 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c7015dd8fc8190bc5f52a12bd46209 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:14 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:59 p.m.