Triple
T7652175
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Daniel Kahneman |
E173277
|
entity |
| Predicate | knownFor |
P22
|
FINISHED |
| Object | prospect theory |
E129165
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: prospect theory | Statement: [Daniel Kahneman, knownFor, prospect theory]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: prospect theory Context triple: [Daniel Kahneman, knownFor, prospect theory]
-
A.
prospect theory
chosen
Prospect theory is a behavioral economic framework that explains how people actually make decisions under risk and uncertainty, highlighting systematic deviations from the predictions of classical expected utility theory.
-
B.
Allais paradox
The Allais paradox is a famous decision-making puzzle in behavioral economics that shows how people's choices under risk often violate the expected utility theory, revealing systematic inconsistencies in rational choice models.
-
C.
behavioral economics
Behavioral economics is a field that integrates insights from psychology into economic theory to explain how real people make decisions that systematically deviate from the predictions of traditional rational-choice models.
-
D.
Ellsberg paradox
The Ellsberg paradox is a famous problem in decision theory and economics that demonstrates how people’s choices often violate expected utility theory due to ambiguity aversion.
-
E.
Fisherian intertemporal choice theory
Fisherian intertemporal choice theory is an economic framework, developed by Irving Fisher, that explains how rational individuals allocate consumption and savings over time to maximize lifetime utility given their income, preferences, and interest rates.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6995473348190a4f41d110d619a18 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c701770ac881909452348c9547ab47 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:15 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c8a21b1ca881908ee73a418d4069a7 |
completed | March 29, 2026, 3:52 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:58 p.m.