Triple

T7602630
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sabra and Shatila massacre E180021 entity
Predicate responsibilityDebate P16556 FINISHED
Object subject of ongoing historical and legal controversy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subject of ongoing historical and legal controversy | Statement: [Sabra and Shatila massacre, responsibilityDebate, subject of ongoing historical and legal controversy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: responsibilityDebate
Context triple: [Sabra and Shatila massacre, responsibilityDebate, subject of ongoing historical and legal controversy]
  • A. ethicalDebate
    Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, questioning, or disputing the moral rightness or wrongness of actions, policies, or principles.
  • B. legalAndEthicalDebate chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an issue, action, or decision is the subject of ongoing discussion and disagreement concerning both its legality and its ethical acceptability.
  • C. debateTopic
    Indicates that one entity serves as the subject or issue being discussed or argued about in a debate involving another entity.
  • D. ethicalResponsibility
    Indicates a relationship in which an entity is morally obligated to act, decide, or respond in a certain way toward another entity or situation.
  • E. inAcademicDebate
    Indicates that one entity is engaged in a formal, scholarly argument or discussion with another entity, typically following academic norms and methods of reasoning.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f3567008190ab01d2ca7b53584a completed March 27, 2026, 3:16 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f9f8e7848190b44d9c16b9c95d37 completed March 27, 2026, 9:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f4e485f88190910b39da52a955fe completed March 27, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:54 p.m.