Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: State v. Mapp, 170 N.E.2d 387 (Ohio 1960) | Statement: [Mapp v. Ohio, priorHistory, State v. Mapp, 170 N.E.2d 387 (Ohio 1960)]

Target entity: State v. Mapp, 170 N.E.2d 387 (Ohio 1960)
Context triple: [Mapp v. Ohio, priorHistory, State v. Mapp, 170 N.E.2d 387 (Ohio 1960)]

• A. Mapp v. Ohio chosen
  Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states, holding that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions.
• B. Brandenburg v. Ohio
  Brandenburg v. Ohio is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly strengthened free speech protections by establishing the "imminent lawless action" test for when advocacy of violence can be punished under the First Amendment.
• C. Murdock v. Pennsylvania
  Murdock v. Pennsylvania is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that held it unconstitutional to impose a license tax on the distribution of religious literature, reinforcing First Amendment protections for religious proselytizing.
• D. Escobedo v. Illinois
  Escobedo v. Illinois is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogations and helped lay the groundwork for the later Miranda warnings.
• E. Betts v. Brady
  Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.