Triple

T75494
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sinti E1508 entity
Predicate culturalTrait P1114 FINISHED
Object oral tradition LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: oral tradition | Statement: [Sinti, culturalTrait, oral tradition]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: culturalTrait
Context triple: [Sinti, culturalTrait, oral tradition]
  • A. culturalTradition chosen
    Indicates a relationship where certain practices, beliefs, or customs are recognized as part of a shared cultural heritage passed down within a group or society.
  • B. hasCulturalFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is characterized by a particular cultural element, attribute, or landmark.
  • C. hasCulturalSignificanceFor
    Indicates that something holds particular cultural meaning, value, or importance for a specified group or community.
  • D. hasCulturalSignificance
    Indicates that something holds notable meaning, value, or importance within a particular culture or cultural context.
  • E. culturalRegion
    Indicates that an entity is located in, associated with, or belongs to a specific cultural region or cultural area.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24c60d19c8190a1b6c105ca59ef5b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25314bd6c81908d1cfd4b83f20049 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24eae77ec81909015906f31f2b62e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:06 a.m.